Legal Opinion

May Seed and Nursery Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided April 15, 1957No. 15518_1PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSEN, Circuit Judge.

The Commissioner of Internal Revenue refused to allow May Seed & Nursery Company, of Shenandoah, Iowa, to have the benefit, under 26 U.S.C.A., Int.Rev.Code of 1939, Excess Profits Taxes, § 710, for its fiscal year 1942, of an unused excess profits tax credit carryover, from its fiscal year 1941, based on a constructive average base period net income established in 1952 between the parties under § 722 of the Code. The result was a determination of deficiency against the taxpayer for the year 1942.

The ground of the Commissioner’s refusal was that no claim for the benefit…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Memphis Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Angelus Milling Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Barry-Wehmiller Machinery Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
  4. St. Louis Amusement Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  5. Wiener Machinery Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Chock Full O' Nuts Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  2. Standard Hosiery Mills, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1957
  3. Headline Publications, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Headline Publications, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1957
  5. May Broadcasting Company v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API