Legal Opinion · Dissent

McNary v. Carlton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1975No. 58371Published

1DissentHolman, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

The calling of an advisory jury in an equity case is a matter within the trial court’s discretion. McCullough v. McCullough, 31 Mo. 226 (1860). And when such a jury is used, its verdict is not binding on the court. We have stated that “Equity cases are rarely tried to a jury. And in those rare instances where an issue is submitted to a jury the verdict is advisory only. The court may accept or reject the verdict and, if accepted, it is the court’s own finding on the fact issue rather than that of the jury.” Edwards v. Maples, 388 S.W.2d 850, 852 (Mo.1965). Contrary to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Edwards v. MaplesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  2. McCullough v. McCulloughSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API