Legal Opinion

WATSON v. Little

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 8, 1953No. 16806PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stukes, Justice.

The pleadings in this action make legal and equitable issues. The appeal is from the result of the trial of the legal issues and, it is said in the record, all equitable issues were reserved to be referred. Hence, the present appeal is not concerned with the equitable issues and they remain for future trial.

The action is for partition of now valuable real property which is located in the business section of the town of Cheraw extending seventy feet, more or less, in width from Market Street, on which it fronts, to Marlboro Street. It was conveyed by J. A. Watson by deed dated…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Johns v. ScobieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Cocks v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
  3. Weston v. MorganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. McGee v. HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1887
  5. Powers v. SmithSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1908

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Freeman v. FreemanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Glover v. GloverAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  3. HEMINGWAY v. MentionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  4. State v. SingleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  5. Horne v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API