Legal Opinion

Village of Dresden v. County of Yates

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1951PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Subdivision 6 of section 231 of the Highway Law enjoins upon appellants in the circumstances of this case the duty to rebuild the bridge (see Town of Easton v. Canal Bd., 216 N. Y. 486; People ex rel. Keene v. Board of Supervisors, 142 N. Y. 271). The fact that the county superintendent has recommended abandonment of the bridge pursuant to subdivision 11 of section 231 does not excuse appellants from performing their duty under subdivision 6. Appellants may continue the pending abandonment proceeding and procure an order of abandonment, but until such order has become effective, their duty…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Keene v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Town of Easton v. . Canal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Town of Huntington v. County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API