Legal Opinion
State v. Heck
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided May 17, 2011No. AC 31790PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PELLEGRINO, J.
The defendant, David S. Heck, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of burglary in the third degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-103 (a), larceny in the second degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-123 (a) (2) and criminal mischief in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-115 (a) (5). On appeal, the defendant claims that (1) the trial court improperly admitted evidence of two burglaries that occurred in New Hampshire, (2) there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction, (3) the court improperly…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BoydSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. BarksdaleConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- State v. VallejoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. AntonarasConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Heck v. Comm'r of Corr.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- Heck v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. FieldsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. HeckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011