Legal Opinion
Firth Construction Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 22, 1996No. 96-393CPublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1491(a)(8) (1994). It concerns a dispute over the award of a contract to lay additional railroad track at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, by the Louisville District of the United States Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”). Firth Construction Co. (“Firth”) seeks an order permanently enjoining an award to the apparent low bidder, M.R. Dillard Construction Co. (“Dillard”). Dillard has been served with all the pleadings here and has made an appearance to defend its interests. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Honeywell, Inc. v. The United States v. Haz-Tad, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
- Keco Industries, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- WPC Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Bowsher v. Merck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Prestex Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Systems Application & Technologies, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Southern Foods Group, L.P. v. State, Department of EducationHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
- Ceres Gulf, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- PCI/RCI v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Lamirage, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.