Legal Opinion
Moss v. . Averell
New York Court of Appeals
Decided March 5, 1853PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] In Moss v. McCullough (7 Barb., 279), the supreme court in the fourth district decided that in an action against a stockholder of the Rossie Lead Mining Company to recover a debt contracted by the company, a judgment previously recovered by the plaintiff against the corporation upon the same demand, wasprima facie evidence of a debt…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bank of United States v. DandridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Welland Canal Co. v. HathawayNew York Supreme Court · 1832
- The BANK OF COLUMBIA v. PATTERSON’S Adm’rSupreme Court of the United States · 1813
- Commercial Bank v. KortrightCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1839
- Clark's Executors v. Van RiemsdykSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Assets Realization Co. v. . HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
- Holland v. Duluth Iron Mining & Development Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Roberts v. W. H. Hughes Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1912
- Durham v. Carbon Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1879
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.