Desilien v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
POLEN, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of trafficking in cocaine and felony murder, and sentenced to seventeen (17) years imprisonment. Appellant argues that the trial court erred in: 1) instructing the jury on “willful blindness”; and 2) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. While it was error for the trial court to instruct the jury on “willful blindness” in the instant case, we believe the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We do not address appellant’s second point on appeal, as it is without merit. We therefore affirm the conviction and sentence.
*1047Appellant was arrested by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- United States v. Charles Demore JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Johnny Rivera, Elena VilaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Gustavo Alvarado, United States of America v. Oscar Oqueli-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Jesus Dario Murrieta-BejaranoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re Standard Jury Instructions in Criminal Cases—Report 2012-07Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
- Hallman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Salomon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Dix v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- Grey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.