People v. Cruz
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
The trial court improperly conducted a Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) in defendant’s absence, requiring a new trial (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656; People v Gebrosky, 80 NY2d 995). It is therefore unnecessary to consider defendant’s remaining contention.
Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum; Judge Smith taking no part.
Order reversed, etc.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. GebroskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
3Cited by17 opinions
- People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. SeabrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.