Legal Opinion

People v. Cruz

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 17, 1992PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and a new trial ordered.

The trial court improperly conducted a Sandoval hearing (People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371) in defendant’s absence, requiring a new trial (see, People v Dokes, 79 NY2d 656; People v Gebrosky, 80 NY2d 995). It is therefore unnecessary to consider defendant’s remaining contention.

Acting Chief Judge Simons and Judges Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur in memorandum; Judge Smith taking no part.

Order reversed, etc.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SandovalNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. People v. DokesNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. People v. GebroskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. People v. FavorNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. People v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. People v. SeabrooksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  5. People v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API