Legal Opinion

People v. Mansell

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 17, 1964No. Crim. 9078PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFiles, J.

In this prosecution for violation of Penal Code, section 288, a preliminary examination was held before a judge pro tempore, who ordered the defendant held to answer as to two alleged offenses. When the case came.before the superior court, a motion made under Penal Code, section 995, was granted and the information was set aside. The court stated, “I don’t think this transcript indicates sufficient evidence to hold this fellow for trial.”

The district attorney has appealed.

The first count in the information alleges an offense against a girl named Debbie, who was 7 years of age at the time of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Bompensiero v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Perry v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. People v. LevesqueCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. People v. Morales, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. (HC) Griffin v. MartinezDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. People v. Lobo CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API