Legal Opinion

Hass v. Security Insurance Co. of New Haven

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On rule to show cause.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

Judgment by default in an action on a policy of insurance having been entered, the defendant, a foreign corporation, now seeks.,to have the judgment'vacated *389and the service of the summons set aside, upon the ground that Charles Selvage, on whom the service was made by the sheriff, was not an officer, director, agent, clerk or engineer of the corporation, as required by section 88 of the act concerning corporations. Rev., p. 193.

The testimony taken under the rule to show cause discloses that Selvage was agent for the Niagara Fire Insurance…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norton v. Berlin Iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1889

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roebling v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935
  2. In Re Petition of Fifteen Registered Voters, Cty. of SussexNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
  3. Trust Co. v. Greenwood CemeteryNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1943
  4. In re the Estate of KoellhofferEssex County Surrogate's Court · 1942
  5. Winters National Bank & Tr Co. v. Midland Acceptance Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API