Coviello v. New York Central Railroad
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Heher, J.
The Federal Employers’ Liability Act (45 U. S. C. A., §§ 51, et seq.) does not speak of interstate commerce in the technical sense. While the earlier cases gave the enactment a much broader purview, the criterion of employment in such commerce now is whether the employe, at the time of the injury, was “engaged in interstate trans portation, or in work so closely related to it as to be practically a part of it?” Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna and Western Railroad Co., 239 U. S. 556; 36 S. Ct. 188; 60 L. Ed. 436; Chicago and N. W. Railroad Co.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Pedersen v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. HarringtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. WintersSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Erie Railroad v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Coviello v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942