Legal Opinion

Barbee v. Baker Car Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

Suit "by Barbee to recover $10,000 damages for personal injuries sustained while in the employ of the defendant.

The declaration avers that the defendant;was subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act, but had not complied with its provisions in that it had procured no indemnity insurance and was not a self insurer within the terms of said act. The declaration then avers:

‘ ‘Plaintiff would show that at the time of the injury he understood and believed that the defendant company were operating under said law, and that, the defendant paid him for a few weeks according to the tenor of said law,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Norma Mooney v. Stainless, Inc., and Stainless Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
  2. City of Nashville v. LathamTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Shipley v. Wellwood Silk Throwing MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Cain v. SiskCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API