Barbee v. Baker Car Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
Suit "by Barbee to recover $10,000 damages for personal injuries sustained while in the employ of the defendant.
The declaration avers that the defendant;was subject to the Workmen’s Compensation Act, but had not complied with its provisions in that it had procured no indemnity insurance and was not a self insurer within the terms of said act. The declaration then avers:
‘ ‘Plaintiff would show that at the time of the injury he understood and believed that the defendant company were operating under said law, and that, the defendant paid him for a few weeks according to the tenor of said law,…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Norma Mooney v. Stainless, Inc., and Stainless Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- City of Nashville v. LathamTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Shipley v. Wellwood Silk Throwing MillsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
- Cain v. SiskCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934