Legal Opinion

George Bauernschmidt Brewing Co. v. McColgan

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 14, 1899PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the'Baltimore City Court (Dennis, J.)

1Opinion of the CourtPage, J.

This suit was brought to recover the value of certain property which was removed by the appellant from the premises of the appellee.

On the 2 2nd of March, 1895, the appellee leased to one George E. Klise, certain property in Baltimore City, to be used “only for the sale of liquors and tobacco,” for the term of one year, beginning on the first day of April, 1895, and ending on the thirty-first day of March, 1896. Klise occupied the property but a short time. On the thirtieth day of April, he assigned the lease to Frederick A. Wineke, who, having entered into possession made such changes in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Van Ness v. PacardSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Northern Central Railway Co. v. Canton Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  3. Loughran v. . RossNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Carlin v. RitterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1888

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Merrell v. GarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Rasch v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1920
  3. Teddy-Rose Enterprises, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  4. O'Brien v. MuellerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API