Legal Opinion

Neill v. Hitchman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1902No. Appeal, No. 128PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal, No. 128, Oct. T., 1901, by plaintiffs, from decree of O. P. Washington Co., No. 1113, in equity, dismissing bill in equity in case of Thomas Neill et al. v. E. T. Hitchman. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Supreme Court. Error assigned was decree dismissing the bill.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Mestbezat,

Thomas Neill, J. M. Neill, R. 0. Neill, J. M. Neill, administrator c. t. a. of the estate of S. A. Neill, deceased, and N. J. Neill, by a written agreement dated June 9, 1899, for the consideration therein named agreed to sell and, “ upon acceptance of the option and privileges ” set forth in said agreement, to convey to E. T. Hitchman the Pittsburg vein of coal, with certain designated mining rights, underlying a tract of land situate in North Strabane township, Washington county, containing 156 acres, more or less. In that agreement, and as a part thereof, is…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wilmore Coal Co. v. BrownU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania · 1906
  2. Swank v. FrettsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  3. Achenbach v. KurtzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API