Legal Opinion

Windham & Windham, Inc. v. Suntrust Bank

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 1, 2012No. A11A1779PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackwell, Judge.

SunTrust Bank sued Windham & Windham, Inc. and Jeffrey and Robyn Windham, alleging that the Windham company was indebted to the Bank, that the Windham company had defaulted on its obligation to repay the indebtedness, and that the Windhams had guarantied the repayment of the indebtedness and, therefore, were liable to the Bank upon the default. The court below awarded summary judgment to the Bank, and both the Windhams and the Windham company appeal. Upon our review of the record, we find no error and affirm the judgment below.

1. The Windhams and the Windham company contend…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cowart v. WidenerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  2. Strength v. LovettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. Benedict v. State Farm Bank, FSBCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Condon v. VickeryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2004
  5. Ellison v. HillCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Grot v. Capital One Bank (USA), N. A.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. John Grot v. Capital One BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API