Legal Opinion

Gloubitz v. Smeed Bros.

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided February 18, 1933No. 5946PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORGAN, J. —

Respondent moved to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the transcript does not contain a certificate to the effect that the contents thereof constitute all the records, papers and files used or considered by the trial judge at the hearing of the case, which was an appeal from the Industrial Accident Board, and relies, among other authorities, on Farm Credit Corp. v. Mulliner, 48 Ida. 306, 281 Pac. 1113.

Idaho Code Annotated, secs. 11-213 and 11-216, are as follows:

11-213. “On appeal from a judgment rendered on an appeal, or from an order, except an order granting or refusing a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steensland v. HessIdaho Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Farm Credit Corp. v. MullinerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Witt v. BealsIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  4. Burgess v. CorkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Idaho First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Julien v. BarkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Owen v. Taylor Ex Rel. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Scheel v. RinardIdaho Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Eichner v. MeyerIdaho Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API