Legal Opinion
Artrip v. Incorporated Village of Piermont
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 27, 1999PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review certain determinations of the municipal respondents which, inter alia, granted variances and site plan approval for the development of property owned by Paradise Development Corp. and for which Daniel Pullo was the contract vendee, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Sherwood, J.), dated January 12, 1999, which granted Daniel Pullo’s motion to dismiss the proceeding for failure to join necessary parties.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs payable to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Save Our-Open Space v. Planning BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- New York City Audubon Society, Inc. v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kam Hampton I Realty Corp. v. ZagataAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by15 opinions
- Red Hook/Gowanus Chamber of Commerce v. New York City Board of StandardsNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- 27th Street Block Ass'n v. Dormitory AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Karmel v. White Plains Common CouncilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Fagelson v. McGowanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Ferruggia v. Zoning Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.