Moore v. Leaseway Transportation Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs.
The resolution of conflicts in the proof, involving as it principally did issues of credibility, was properly left to the jury, and appellant now points to no errors of law requiring disturbance of the jury’s verdict.
We decline, the invitation of appellant to reconsider what he concedes is the present rule of law in New York, namely, that, if the jury finds that the owner of a motor vehicle has forbidden its user to carry any passenger in the vehicle, the owner is not liable to a person who…
2Cited by33 opinions
- Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Nelson v. Times Square Stores Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- American Home Assurance Co. v. Hartford InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Lexow & Jenkins v. Hertz Commercial Leasing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- McCummings v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.