Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anchor Hocking Glass Corp. v. Allen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 12, 1964No. E-322Published

1DissentSturgis, Chief Judge

At the close of plaintiff’s case and again ■at the close of all the evidence motions of the defendant Anchor Hocking for a directed verdict were denied. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff widow against defendants Bragg and Anchor Hocking and found defendant Henley & .Beckwith, Inc., not guilty. Bragg and Anchor Hocking filed motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict and for a new trial, which were denied. Anchor Hocking sued out this appeal and Bragg joined therein, but it is interesting to note that Bragg’s brief herein is devoted exclusively to arguments supporting the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lingefelt v. HannerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  2. Smith's Bakery, Incorporated v. JerniganDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  3. Springer v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  4. Bryant v. Atlantic Car Rental, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  5. Smith v. City Products CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API