State v. Gerald
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
113 N.J. 40 (1988)
549 A.2d 792
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
WALTER M. GERALD, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Argued May 5, 1987.
Decided October 25, 1988.
Lowell Espey and Kathryn A. Brock, Designated Counsel, argued the cause for appellant (Alfred A. Slocum, Public Defender, attorney).
James R. Wronko, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (W. Cary Edwards, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; James R. Wronko and Boris Moczula, of counsel and on the briefs).
The opinion of the Court was delivered by CLIFFORD, J.
Defendant was convicted of…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited149 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.