Legal Opinion

BELL v. SELF INCORPORATED

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 2023No. 2:23-cv-03646Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA CARL BELL, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 23-CV-3646 : SELF INCORPORATED, et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM KENNEY, J. OCTOBER 2, 2023 Currently before the Court is the Amended Complaint (“Am. Compl.”) of pro se Plaintiff Carl Bell,1 wherein Bell alleges that Defendants “violated federal law on theft of moveable property” and obstructed court processes including his “right to a fair and speedy [trial].” (ECF No. 4.) Bell seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis. For the following reasons, the Court will…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Kelley Mala v. Crown Bay MarinaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  5. Miguel Perez v. James FenoglioCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API