Legal Opinion

In Re Kantola

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided November 7, 1984No. Docket 74667PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent parents appeal as of right from the September 30, 1983, order of the Marquette Probate Court terminating their parental rights in their two daughters, Kristina and Crystal, pursuant to MCL 712A.19a, subds (e) and (f); MSA 27. 3178(598.19a), subds (e) and (f).

Respondents first argue that the admission of hearsay evidence during the hearing to terminate parental rights and the trial court’s reliance on that hearsay in ordering termination resulted in a denial of their due process rights. A hearing to terminate parental rights is within the dispositional phase of the proceedings, In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Fritts v. KrughMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. In the Matter of LaFlureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. In Re BaileyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. In the Matter of Taurus F.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  5. In Re IrvingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  2. In Re PerryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. In re MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1988
  4. Department of Social Services v. MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re FrasierMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API