Legal Opinion

Boerstler v. Hoover

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 15, 1997No. 84160PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARGRAVE, Justice.

SUMMARY OF FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 1 Richard Boerstler was injured while driving his employer’s truck, in a collision caused by the negligence of Hoover, an uninsured motorist. The jury awarded Boerstler a $65,000.00 judgment against Hoover. Boerstler then made a claim against employer’s insurance carrier to recover under the uninsured motorist provision of employer’s policy. The dispute in this matter concerns the amount of uninsured motorist coverage which employer’s insurer is obligated to provide Boerstler.

¶2 Employer’s liability policy was written pursuant to 36…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Moser v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
  2. May v. National Union Fire Insurance Co. of PittsburghSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  3. Mann Ex Rel. Mann v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
  4. Cofer v. MortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Perkins v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vickers v. Progressive N. Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2018
  2. Anaya-Smith v. Federated Mutual Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API