Legal Opinion

Monolith Portland Cement Company, a Corporation v. Douglas Oil Company of California, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 16, 1962No. 17036_1PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge.

Monolith operates a cement plant near Tehachapi, California. Douglas is an oil producer. One of its products is commercial fuel oil, a residue in distillation of petroleum. Monolith’s plant, as all cement plants, needs fuel to make the clinkers that ultimately become cement. The Tehachapi plant has dual firing equipment. Sometimes natural gas is used and other times it is fuel oil.

For industrial use in California, proper governmental authority authorizes public gas suppliers to make contracts which provide for intermittent service. That is, when domestic demands are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Guerrieri v. SeveriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Mayers v. Loew's, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Oregon Plywood Sales Corporation v. Sutherlin Plywood Corporation and Nordic Plywood, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  4. Jennings v. Petrol CorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Parnell v. StanfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morgan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1964
  2. Kodiak 1981 Drill v. Delhi Gas Pipeline, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1987
  3. Inamed Corp. v. KuzmakDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2002
  4. B.F. Goodrich Co. v. Vinyltech Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1989
  5. In re Sterling Navigation Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API