Legal Opinion

Zinman v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 25, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2112 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Mencer,

This is a case of first impression involving the interpretation and application of Sections 3 and 4 of the Act of December 10, 1970, P.L. 884 (Act), 40 P.S. §§1010.3-.4, which regulate the conditions under which the Insurance Commissioner (Commissioner) may approve the conversion of a mutual insurance company *272to a stock insurance company. Unfortunately, in making Ms decision to approve the conversion of Frank-ford Union Mutual Insurance Company (Frankford), the Commissioner improperly relied upon documents which had never been introduced into evidence at the hearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShisslakCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. McBrideSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Commonwealth v. StantonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Snyder v. State Ethics CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Miller v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Pocono Farms East Ass'n v. Sanford, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Monroe County1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API