Legal Opinion
Royal Insurance of America v. Vinciguerra
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 16, 1990PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously reversed on the law without costs and *874petition granted. Memorandum: Petitioner applied to stay arbitration of its insured’s claim for underinsurance benefits, contending that the insured never purchased underinsured motorist’s protection (see, Insurance Law § 3420 [f] [2]). Supreme Court denied the motion, holding that, because the declarations page of the policy did not set forth a per person limit for uninsured motorist protection and set forth only a per accident limit of $20,000, the insured had underinsurance to the extent of $10,000.
Supplementary uninsured…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reichel v. Government Employees InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Morris v. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1987
- In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. VillarrubiaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Terwilliger v. American Motorists InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. AnnunziatoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Liberty Mutual Insurance v. AlbertoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Molnar v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991