Legal Opinion

Pacord, Inc. v. United States of America a & E Industries, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 7, 1998No. 96-56738PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge DAVID R. THOMPSON; Dissent by Judge T.G. NELSON.

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:

Appellant PacOrd, Inc. (“PacOrd”) provided ship repair work for the government as a subcontractor to A & E Industries (“A & E”). PacOrd contends it entered into an oral or implied-in-fact contract directly with the government in which government officials agreed to guaranty A & E’s payment to PacOrd in order to induce PacOrd to work on the project. PacOrd completed its work, the government paid A & E, but A & E did not pay PacOrd. PacOrd then sued A & E for payment under the subcontract and sued…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Schweiker v. HansenSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. City of El Centro v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  4. Algonac Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
  5. Clark v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lublin Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
  2. United States v. Abu KhatallahCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
  3. Pacord, Inc. v. United States of America a & E Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. KhatallahDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API