Legal Opinion

Coe v. Greenley

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 8, 1922PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

tain land in Knox County. It is brought to this court under what is termed in our practice a short form of transcript, which, as defined by the statute (Sec. 1479, R. S. 1919) means a certified copy of the judgment, together with the order granting the appeal. Upon the filing of this transcript, there was no compliance with the other requirements of the same section and of our rules numbered eleven, twelve and thirteen, requiring the filing of an abstract of the record to entitle the appellant to a review in this court. If it be contended that the printed pamphlet of sixty-eight pages and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Kirkland v. Bixby.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1920
  2. Coleman v. RobertsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
  3. Johnston v. RaganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  4. Vahldick v. VahldickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  5. City of St. Louis v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1919

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pfotenhauer v. RidgwaySupreme Court of Missouri · 1925
  2. Stroker v. City of St. JosephSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
  3. Schwartzman v. London & Lancashire Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API