Rauso v. Rauso
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*889In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Martin, J.), dated September 30, 2008, as denied those branches of his motion which were for an award of a pendente lite attorney’s fee and for leave to amend his counterclaim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
A postnuptial agreement which “ ‘is fair on its face will be enforced according to its terms unless there is proof of fraud, duress, overreaching, or unconscionability’ ” (Schultz v…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Van Kipnis v. Van KipnisNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Herzfeld v. HerzfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Etzion v. EtzionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- DelDuca v. DelDucaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- O'Lear v. O'LearAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Petracca v. PetraccaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Moss v. MossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- McDonald v. Browne-McDonaldDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Ginns v. GinnsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- Hammer v. HammerNew York Supreme Court · 2012
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.