Legal Opinion
Doe v. Hamilton
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 11, 2006No. ED 87225PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, SR., Presiding Judge.
Appellant, Charles Hamilton (“Defendant”), appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying his motion to set aside the default judgment which had been entered in favor of Respondent, John Doe (“Plaintiff’). We affirm.
On February 24, 2004, Plaintiff filed a two count petition against Defendant for childhood sexual abuse and/or battery (“Count I”) and intentional infliction of emotional distress (“Count II”) (“the petition”). In the petition, Plaintiff alleged, inter alia, that: (1) Defendant, an adult male, sexually abused Plaintiff…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McElroy v. Eagle Star Group, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Snelling v. Reliance Automotive, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Hung Nguyen v. Shy Yung WangMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. CamickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Agnello v. WalkerMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
- Paskon v. WrightMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- John Solomon v. St. Louis Circuit AttorneyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
- Lonnie Snelling v. Kevin T. Segbers, Defendant/Respondent.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2016