Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Muckle

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided October 17, 2003No. 01-P-12PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

Codefendants Paul Muckle and Ricardo Kirby shot several bullets into a parked Volkswagen Jetta automobile. The shooting was both a warning to and an act of revenge against the Jetta’s owner, who was Muckle’s former housemate and who, according to Muckle, wrongfully was withholding Muckle’s personal property as hostage to an overdue bill. Charged with malicious destruction of property over $250, possession of a firearm, and possession of ammunition,2 Muckle and Kirby were tried to a jury. The jury eventually found Kirby guilty of all charges,3 with Muckle guilty only of malicious destruction…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FlebotteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  2. Commonwealth v. PeruzziMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. DelgadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  4. Commonwealth v. ToneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  5. Commonwealth v. LongoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Robinson v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  3. Decker v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009
  4. Commonwealth v. MauricioMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2017
  5. Commonwealth v. VickersMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API