Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 4, 2009No. 02C12218; A141457PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Plaintiff appeals a supplemental judgment for filing fees that previously had been deferred. On appeal, plaintiff contends that the court erred in entering the supplemental judgment without making a determination that he had the ability to pay the fees. The state concedes that the trial court erred in that regard. We agree and accept that concession. See State ex rel Baker v. Cook, 171 Or App 719, 16 P3d 1184 (2000) (citing former ORS 21.605(1)(a) (1999), repealed by Or Laws 2007, ch 493, §§ 18, 18a; holding that the trial court erred in imposing an obligation to pay previously deferred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Baker v. CookCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. STATE EX REL. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API