Legal Opinion

Peden v. Carpenter

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 11, 1974No. 8504PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REYNOLDS, Justice.

The defense of payment was interposed to a suit on a note. The evidence supports the trial court’s finding that the payments made were lawfully applied to another debt owed by the maker of the note to the owner. Affirmed.

Plaintiff J. R. Carpenter instituted this suit to recover on a demand note executed by defendant Clem Peden on October 17, 1968, and made payable to Carpenter in the sum of $2,500, bearing interest from maturity at the rate of 6½% per annum. Pe-den pleaded payment. The note, introduced in evidence, reflects no payment credited thereon, Carpenter having…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hendershot v. Amarillo National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972
  2. Matossy v. FroshTexas Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Morgan v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  4. Pyle v. ByrneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1959
  5. Lemon v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Martin v. AdairCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Hastings v. American General Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API