Legal Opinion

Marshall v. Watson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 28, 1897PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from the County Court of McLennan. Tried helow before lion. W. H. Jenkins.

1Opinion of the Court

FISHER,

Associate Justice.—This suit was by appellee, Watson, against Charles Dunning and Marshall, as the makers of a certain promissory note. Dunning was principal and Marshall was surety. The defense pleaded was that the note, since its execution, had been altered in a material respect. There was some evidence both ways bearing upon this question.

The judgment below was rendered in favor of appellee against appellant Marshall, and in favor of defendant Dunning. Marshall alone appeals.

During the progress of the trial, and a temporary adjournment of the court, two of the jurors who had been…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATION v. McCaslinTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Texas Milk Products Co. v. BirtcherTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. AndersonUtah Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Palm v. ChernowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  5. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. BurnsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API