Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Lamb v. Georgia-Pacific Corp.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 13, 1990No. A89A2025Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partDeen, Presiding Judge

In this case, the appellant alleged that the particle board manufactured by the appellee contained a defect which caused the board to “bubble.” The appellee refuted this allegation with the expert’s affidavit indicating that the “bubbled” particle board submitted for examination had a high moisture content and that dry particle board does not “bow or cup.” The appellee’s expert did not literally declare the absence of any defect, but I do not believe his affidavit is subject to any reasonable construction other than that the bubbling was due to moisture rather than any defect.

The appellant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. ArnallCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API