Home Life Insurance v. Miller
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Kirby, J.,
(after stating the facts). Appellant insists that the court erred in refusing to give its peremptory instruction directing a verdict in its favor and the contention must be sustained.
The rule has often been stated that this court will not interfere with a verdict supported by any substantial evidence, and that in arriving at that conclusion the strongest probative force will be given to the testimony and the reasonable inferences deducible therefrom favoring the party for whom the verdict is rendered. If the facts are such that men of reasonable intelligence may honestly draw…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen v. BanisterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Guardian Life Insurance v. DixonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1922
- Industrial Mutual Indemnity Co. v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Harris v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of N.Y. v. RaymondSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- McGill v. MillerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
- State Ex Rel. Bowdon v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
- Albert v. MorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945
- Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'n v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1938
- Tippets v. Gem State Mutual Life Association, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.