Legal Opinion

Blumburg v. Zimmerman

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 26, 1954No. 34991Published

1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.

1. The court overruled the defendants’ renewed general demurrer to the petition as amended, seeking recovery of an agreed commission for procuring certain lumber business for the defendants, and this judgment, unexcepted to, established as the law of the case that the petition as then amended stated a cause of action. Allen v. City of Atlanta, 86 Ga. App. 476 (71 S. E. 2d 871); Darling Stores Corp. v. Beatus, 197 Ga. 125 (28 S. E. 2d 124); Equitable Mfg. Co. v. Hill-Atkinson Co., 17 Ga. App. 494 (2) (87 S. E. 715); Central of Ga. Ry. Co. v. Waldo, 6 Ga. App. 840 (65 S. E. 1098).

2. By a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WaldoCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
  2. Darling Stores Corp. v. BeatusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  3. Equitable Manufacturing Co. v. Hill-Atkinson Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. Allen v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API