Legal Opinion

Pate v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1935No. 7 Div. 111PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAMFORD, Judge.

It has many times been held by this court that a constructive possession alone is not sufficient to justify a conviction for the unlawful possession of whisky. There must be evidence from which the jury can infer a guilty scienter. Burroughs v. State, 24 Ala. App. 579, 139 So. 115.

When the evidence for the state was all in and the state had rested its case, the defendant made a motion to exclude the evidence and to discharge the defendant. Denial of defendant’s motion to exclude all evidence is never reversible error. McMullen v. Daniel, 229 Ala. 194, 155 So. 687.

However, there…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McMullen v. DanielSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. Burroughs v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1932

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Adkins v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. Brooks v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Walls v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940
  4. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  5. Snodgrass v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API