Fox v. Knickerbocker Engraving Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity. On the master’s report and exceptions thereto, the complainants move to confirm the report, overrule the exceptions, and treble the amount awarded under section 4921 of the Revised Statutes of the United States [U. S. Comp. St 1901, p. 3395], while defendant moves for the allowance of its exceptions, and prays no decree for a money judgment be made or any master’s fee or costs be allowed.
1Opinion of the Court
RAY, District Judge.
December 15, 1905, an interlocutory decree herein was entered in favor of complainants against the defendant, adjudging that defendant had infringed U. S. letters patent to Thomas S. Fox, May 28, 1901, No. 675,272, for improvements in half tone *423negatives, by making and using half tone negatives, and also by using in the manufacture of same the methods and processes described in certain claims of such patent, and that complainants recover of defendant the gains, profits, savings, and advantages which it had derived, received, or made by reason of such infringements. It was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Topliff v. TopliffSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Root v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Smith v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Rude v. WestcottSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Sulphite Pulp Co. v. De Grasse Paper Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1911