Legal Opinion

Neel v. A. Perrino Constr., Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 10, 2018No. 105366PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIM McCORMACK, J.:

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants Paul and Stephanie Neel ("the Neels") appealed the trial court's decision granting a motion to stay pending arbitration. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part the trial court's decision but remand for the limited purpose of staying all claims against all parties pending arbitration.

Factual and Procedural History

{¶ 2} The Neels filed a complaint on August 16, 2016, against defendant-appellee A. Perrino Construction, Inc. ("Perrino"), along with defendants Pat Perrino, Greenwalt Architects, Inc., and Christopher E. Greenwalt. The complaint…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Taylor Building Corp. of America v. BenfieldOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Collins v. Click Camera & Video, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Johnson v. Mobil Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sebold v. Latina Design Build Group, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  2. Fries v. Greg G. Wright & Sons, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. Gerston v. Parma VTA, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  4. Zellner v. Prestige Gardens Rehab. & Nursing Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. AJZ's Hauling, L.L.C. v. TruNorth Warranty Program of N. Am.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API