Lundy v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, Chief Judge.
Appellant, Richard D. Lundy, appeals his judgment and sentence resulting from his conviction for grand theft. We find no error in regard to his conviction and, therefore, affirm his conviction and sentence, with the exception of costs imposed.
We do find, however, that the trial judge erred in imposing costs without affording appellant his due process rights of notice and an opportunity to be heard in regard to the imposition of those costs. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla.1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla.1984). We decline to readdress and certify this due…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jenkins v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
- Mays v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- United States v. Edwin PaganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Jose Rivera-Velez, A/K/A "Cheo,"Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- United States v. Larry Vivian Cooper, A/K/A Larry v. CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Minor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990