Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Carlson

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided February 29, 2000No. 24639, 24640, 24641Published

1Dissent

Judge LANSING,

Dissenting.

I respectfully dissent. In my view, the majority opinion ignores several features of the warrant affidavit which, when examined in light of controlling constitutional standards, render the affidavit insufficient to show probable cause. These important elements include the anonymity of the informant, the omission of the age of some of the information provided by an officer, and the inclusion of unsubstantiated rumor and suspicion.

In Illinois v. Gates, 462 U.S. 213, 103 S.Ct. 2317, 76 L.Ed.2d 527 (1983), the United States Supreme Court adopted a “totality of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. ThompsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. GomezIdaho Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API