Legal Opinion

City of New York v. Rodriguez

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided January 10, 1983PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Final judgment entered July 21, 1981 is reversed, without costs; tenant’s affirmative defense of breach of warranty of habitability (Real Property Law, § 235-b) is reinstated and a trial is ordered.

Landlord, the City of New York, initiated this nonpayment proceeding to recover rental arrears of $975, for the months of February through May, 1981. The petition was subsequently amended to include additional rental arrears, bringing the aggregate amount of rent sought to $1,545. Tenant has admittedly withheld that amount of rent.

As an affirmative defense to this proceeding…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Park West Management Corp. v. MitchellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. Amanuensis, Ltd. v. BrownCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  3. Jackson v. RiveraCivil Court of the City of New York · 1971
  4. Suarez v. Rivercross Tenants' Corp.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1981
  5. Goldner v. DoknovitchAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Department of Housing Preservation & Development v. SartorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Lawrence v. MartinCivil Court of the City of New York · 1986
  3. Linden Hill No. 1 Cooperative Corp. v. KleinerCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984
  4. Lacks v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. Geffner v. PhillipsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API