Legal Opinion

Laymon v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1961No. 29,867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*64Arterburn, J.

*The appellant was charged in two counts, the first with embezzlement of money-in the amount of Nine Hundred Forty Dollars and Eight-one cents ($940.81) while employed with the Logansport Light and Water Office of the city of Logansport. In the second count he was charged with grand larceny of the same amount.

The prosecution was instituted under the provisions of Burns’ Ann. St. §10-1701 (1956 Repl.). The trial was by court, who found the appellant guilty of the crime of embezzlement and not guilty of the crime of grand larceny. Appellant was sentenced accordingly.

The sole…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Parker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Loveless v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Hudson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Watts v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Stock v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Bowman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Winningham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Vandeveer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Chamness v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API