State v. Soloman
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Chief Justice.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of guilt after a plea pursuant to an agreement.
We take jurisdiction pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-1711.
We must answer two questions in order to determine this appeal:
1. Which statute sets the punishment for the crime charged?
2. Did the court adequately inform the defendant of the nature and range of the possible sentences under the applicable statute?
The facts necessary for a determination of these issues are as follows. At approximately 3:00 a.m. on 23 September 1976, the defendant entered the apartment of Eva Macias through a window and,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Consolidated Motors, Inc. v. SkousenArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- State v. CarrArizona Supreme Court · 1972
- State v. GeigerArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. CuthbertsonArizona Supreme Court · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. GordonArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. SolomanArizona Supreme Court · 1980
- State Ex Rel. Hyder v. HughesArizona Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980