Montgomery v. Pickle
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Erankum, Judge.
1. Where in a trover action for described personal property, the defendants made a motion for a summary judgment based on the deposition of the plaintiff and the pleadings on file in the case, the burden was on the movants to show that they were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law and that there was no genuine issue of fact to be decided by a jury. Code Ann. Ch. 110-12; Motorola &c. Electronics v. South Ga. &c. Co., 104 Ga. App. 376, 382 (121 SE2d 672).
2. The purpose of a motion for a summary judgment is to eliminate a jury trial where it would be unnecessary; and where…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
3Cited by10 opinions
- Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Tingle v. Arnold, Cate & AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
- Food Fair, Inc. v. MockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Hawes v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.