Legal Opinion

Montgomery v. Pickle

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 4, 1963No. 40220PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Erankum, Judge.

1. Where in a trover action for described personal property, the defendants made a motion for a summary judgment based on the deposition of the plaintiff and the pleadings on file in the case, the burden was on the movants to show that they were entitled to a judgment as a matter of law and that there was no genuine issue of fact to be decided by a jury. Code Ann. Ch. 110-12; Motorola &c. Electronics v. South Ga. &c. Co., 104 Ga. App. 376, 382 (121 SE2d 672).

2. The purpose of a motion for a summary judgment is to eliminate a jury trial where it would be unnecessary; and where…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Scales v. PeevyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Summer-Minter & Associates, Inc. v. GiordanoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Tingle v. Arnold, Cate & AllenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  3. Cotton States Mutual Insurance v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  4. Food Fair, Inc. v. MockCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
  5. Hawes v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API