Legal Opinion

John H. Heald Co. v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 11, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

In 1840 the James River and Kanawha Company, pursuant to authority previously granted to it by the General Assembly of Virginia, completed its canal along James River from Richmond to Lynchburg as a means of public transportation.

But the development of the railroad as a superior method of transportation and the severe flood damage suffered by the canal and its locks in 1877 practically put an end to the undertaking. Consequently, by an act approved February 27, 1879 (Acts of 1878-79, ch. 139, p. 118), the General Assembly authorized the sale of all of the properties, rights, franchises, etc.,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blanford v. Trust Co. of NorfolkSupreme Court of Virginia · 1925
  2. City of Lynchburg v. Commonwealth ex rel. C. & O. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1935
  3. Hurt & Son v. Myers & AxtellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1887

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Lynchburg v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API