Legal Opinion

Protest 58343-K/90304 of Deinert

United States Customs Court

Decided September 16, 1942No. 47544PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*412Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It appears that the sole use of these articles is in connection with mountings in rings, that they are adjusted, after importation, to fit the top of the ring in which they are to be used, and initials or designs are inserted in the holes which have been provided therein prior to importation. The plaintiff testified that he had been importing these-articles for'a period of 8 years and they had always been classified as manufactures of mother-of-pearl at 35 percent under paragraph 1538 up to the time of the importation in question. The examiner also testified, in behalf…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Robinson & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Westergaard, Berg-Johnsen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  2. Naumes Forwarding Service v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API