Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Halley
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 19, 1894No. 1898PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Error from Tarrant. Tried below before Hon. W. D. Harris.
1Opinion of the Court
HEAD, Associate Justice.
—
The judgment sought to be revised in this proceeding was rendered in the court below on February 13,1893. On the 13th of May, 1893, the parties herein entered into a written agreement, which, among other things, provides as follows:
“Now, therefore, in consideration of the covenants herein contained to be performed by said parties of the second part, and of the sum of one dollar by them in hand paid to said parties of the first part, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, the said parties of the first part (defendants in error) hereby agree to stay execution and…
2Cited by8 opinions
- United States Consol. Seeded Raisin Co. v. Chaddock & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
- Rodriguez v. Villarreal, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
- Aguilar v. AbrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- 1 Coventry Court, LLC v. the Downs of Hillcrest Residential Association, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2026
- Aquamarine Pools of Texas LLC v. Cynthia Amelse, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.